howclose.to
NEAR ZERO CEMENT

The problemsMaterialsNear-Zero Cement

Updated · July 2026

How close are we to cement without the carbon?Can we make concrete without wrecking the climate?

Can we make concrete without wrecking the climate?How close are we to cement without the carbon?

Cement is about 8% of global CO2; low-clinker chemistries and carbon capture can cut it deeply, but not yet at commodity cost and scale.Making cement pumps out huge amounts of CO2. New recipes and capture can slash it - if they stay cheap enough to use everywhere.

Current stageScalingScaling toward dependable, competitive operationMaking it work at useful scale
Read the evidence Where we stand
The path so far

Recorded milestones

  1. Portland cement patented

  2. Industrial CCS enters operation

Open tests · conceptual branches

TODAY
  1. OPEN TEST02 ↗
    Replace the kiln chemistryDrop-In Alternative BinderBrimstone passed ASTM C150 in the lab; Sublime's planned 30,000-tonne plant was paused.Make non-limestone or electrochemical cement that passes mainstream Portland-cement standards and scales beyond a pilot.
  2. OPEN TEST04 ↗
    Scale beyond one plantNear-Zero Commercial FleetOnly about 35 Mt/year is announced for 2030, and announced capacity is not production.Operate enough certified near-zero cement plants to supply the roughly 350 Mt/year needed in 2030.
TODAY
OPEN TEST02 ↗
Replace the kiln chemistryDrop-In Alternative BinderBrimstone passed ASTM C150 in the lab; Sublime's planned 30,000-tonne plant was paused.Make non-limestone or electrochemical cement that passes mainstream Portland-cement standards and scales beyond a pilot.
OPEN TEST04 ↗
Scale beyond one plantNear-Zero Commercial FleetOnly about 35 Mt/year is announced for 2030, and announced capacity is not production.Operate enough certified near-zero cement plants to supply the roughly 350 Mt/year needed in 2030.
Milestones are in recorded order. Open tests are separate questions, not a forecast.Milestones are in date order. Open tests are separate tests, not a promise.
Near-Zero CementWhere we stand

The path shows Industrial CCS enters operation. Open thresholds are separate tests in a conceptual map, not a forecast. No single percentage represents progress.

01 · Where we standWhere we stand

Where we standWhere we stand

The current stage, the evidence recorded, and the single threshold that gates the next stage.The stage reached, the evidence recorded, and the one test still blocking the next step.

What the evidence has shownWhat the evidence has shown

Making cement pumps out huge amounts of CO2. New recipes and capture can slash it - if they stay cheap enough to use everywhere.Cement is about 8% of global CO2; low-clinker chemistries and carbon capture can cut it deeply, but not yet at commodity cost and scale.

2 of 4 tests recorded2 of 4 thresholds achieved open
✓Use much less clinkerIndustrial Low-Clinker CementAchieved
Replace the kiln chemistryDrop-In Alternative BinderOpen test
✓Store kiln carbon permanentlyFull-Chain Cement CCSAchieved
Scale beyond one plantNear-Zero Commercial FleetOpen test

The next testBlocking threshold

Replace the kiln chemistryDrop-In Alternative Binder

A novel-route producer must run a kilotonne-scale plant and publish strength, durability, EPD and cost data.A novel-route producer must run a kilotonne-scale plant and publish strength, durability, EPD and cost data.

02 · Thresholds & evidenceThresholds & evidence

What would count as proof?What would count as proof?

A clear test, the evidence behind it, and the limits of the claim.A clear test, the evidence behind it, and what it still leaves open.

✓Achieved · February 2023

Use much less clinkerIndustrial Low-Clinker Cement

Holcim's French line is rated for 500,000 tonnes yearly and claims 50% lower CO2 than CEM I.Operate a plant producing at least 100,000 tonnes per year of standards-compliant cement with at least 40% lower cradle-to-gate emissions.

Recorded result The Saint-Pierre-la-Cour calcined-clay line reached industrial nameplate, though delivered tonnes were not disclosed.

Next test Publish third-party EPDs and annual delivered tonnage across multiple calcined-clay plants.

Still to demonstrateWhat this does not establishA separate system can still have different conditions and results.The named measurement has no wider implication until the supporting system test is also shown.

View every evidence record

Achieved

Use much less clinkerIndustrial Low-Clinker Cement

Holcim's French line is rated for 500,000 tonnes yearly and claims 50% lower CO2 than CEM I.Operate a plant producing at least 100,000 tonnes per year of standards-compliant cement with at least 40% lower cradle-to-gate emissions.

Recorded result: February 2023 · The Saint-Pierre-la-Cour calcined-clay line reached industrial nameplate, though delivered tonnes were not disclosed.

Next test: Publish third-party EPDs and annual delivered tonnage across multiple calcined-clay plants.

Holcim calcined-clay deployment ↗

Open test

Replace the kiln chemistryDrop-In Alternative Binder

Brimstone passed ASTM C150 in the lab; Sublime's planned 30,000-tonne plant was paused.Make non-limestone or electrochemical cement that passes mainstream Portland-cement standards and scales beyond a pilot.

Next test: A novel-route producer must run a kilotonne-scale plant and publish strength, durability, EPD and cost data.

Achieved

Store kiln carbon permanentlyFull-Chain Cement CCS

Brevik completed the chain in 2025, but its design addresses about half the plant's emissions.Capture cement-kiln CO2, transport it and inject it into monitored permanent geological storage.

Recorded result: August 2025 · The first Brevik cargo was injected 2,600 metres beneath the North Sea.

Next test: Brevik must publish a full-year captured and stored total against its 400,000 t/year design.

Brevik CCS opening ↗

Open test

Scale beyond one plantNear-Zero Commercial Fleet

Only about 35 Mt/year is announced for 2030, and announced capacity is not production.Operate enough certified near-zero cement plants to supply the roughly 350 Mt/year needed in 2030.

Next test: Track final investment decisions, commissioning and certified output for the 35 Mt project pipeline.

03 · The recordThe record

The record behind the verdictThe record behind the verdict

Major milestones and smaller context events share one source-linked record. Scheduled targets are marked separately from recorded events.Milestones, smaller events and setbacks share one sourced record. Scheduled targets are marked separately from recorded events.

Event key
TheoryExperimentFundingSetbackPolicyDeployment Future / scheduled
1824-19892 events1 shown

The Clinker Age

This record spans “Portland cement is patented” to “Ransome patents rotary kiln”.

1824
Portland cement is patentedTheory
Joseph Aspdin patented artificial stone made by calcining limestone and clay, naming it Portland cement.
1885
Ransome patents rotary kiln
Frederick Ransome patented a rotating cement kiln, the ancestor of the continuous high-temperature process used today.
1990-20031 event0 shown

Measuring Industrial Carbon

Recorded event: “Modern emissions baseline begins”.

2004-20131 event1 shown

New Binders Emerge

Recorded event: “Calcined-clay concept takes shape”.

2014-20233 events1 shown

Pilots, Standards and Pledges

This record spans “Calera shuts after demonstration” to “LC3 reaches permanent production”.

2014
Calera shuts after demonstrationSetback
Calera closed after placing roughly 100 tonnes of low-carbon material, showing chemistry did not guarantee a business.
2014
Brevik tests amine capture
A six-month mobile unit campaign began on real cement-kiln flue gas to test post-combustion CO2 capture.
2020
LC3 reaches permanent production
The LC3 project reported its first permanent large-scale production in Colombia after multi-country durability trials.
2024-205013 events4 shown

Full-Chain Scale Test

This record spans “Fortera opens Redding plant” to “Announced capacity reaches 35 Mt” and includes scheduled targets.

2024
Fortera opens Redding plant
A 15,000 t/year mineralized-cement plant opened; initial 15% blends cut concrete emissions about 10%, not 70%.
2024
Near-zero threshold is definedPolicy
IEA definitions set a sliding cement threshold of 125-40 kgCO2e/t depending on clinker ratio.
2025
Global low-carbon ratings launch
An AA-to-G ratings system tied to third-party-verified product declarations made cement and concrete carbon classifications usable in procurement.
2025
Ghana scales calcined clay
A flash calciner exceeding 400,000 t/year began producing clinker-substitute clay; this is not zero-carbon cement.
2025
Sublime pauses commercial plantSetback
Sublime paused its planned 30,000 t/year Holyoke plant after losing an $87 million federal award.
2026
Brevik operates at industrial scaleDeployment
Brevik remained operational with 400,000 tCO2/year design capture, equal to about half the plant's emissions.
2026
Electric process makes Portland clinker
Holcim raw meal repeatedly yielded Portland-quality clinker through electric calcination and sintering; undisclosed output keeps this a proof of concept, not a pilot plant.
2026
Pure Oxyfuel research kiln startsWe are here
The 450-tonne-clinker-per-day catch4climate research kiln entered operation after first producing clinker in May; capture and storage at that rate remain unproved.
2029
GeZero targets full captureDeploymentTarget
Heidelberg plans for its Geseke project to capture and store about 700,000 tCO2/year from 2029.
2030
Announced capacity reaches 35 MtDeploymentTarget
Projects announced for 2030 total about 35 Mt/year of near-zero cement, only 10% of the IEA-aligned requirement.
2023-20505 events0 shown

Additional records

This record spans “Calcined clay reaches 500 kilotonnes” to “Industry net-zero deadline arrives” and includes scheduled targets.

2023
Calcined clay reaches 500 kilotonnes
Holcim opened a line rated for 500,000 t/year of cement with 50% lower CO2 than CEM I, based on company claims.
2023
Clinker-free plant is commissioned
Hoffmann Green commissioned its H2 plant with 250,000 t/year nameplate capacity; that rating is capacity, not achieved output.
2023
Alternative route meets C150
Brimstone obtained third-party ASTM C150 certification for laboratory Portland cement made from calcium-silicate rock.
2023
Cement-free concrete enters a building
About 60 tonnes of Portland-cement-free concrete were placed in foundations and shear walls during a Seattle seismic retrofit; its binder remained proprietary.
2050
Industry net-zero deadline arrivesPolicyTarget
GCCA members target net-zero concrete across the value chain by 2050; this remains a voluntary industry commitment.
— end of record · 25 events shown —
04 · The dataThe data

The data behind the verdictThe data behind the verdict

Read each measure with its units, conditions, uncertainty and source; targets remain distinct from observations.Read each chart with its conditions, limits and source. Future targets remain distinct from recorded results.

Open figure in archive: Most historical progress came from efficiency and clinker substitution; the curve remains far above the IEA near-zero band.Open figure in archive: Scale ranges from novel-binder pilots to industrial SCM production. The products and emissions cuts are not equivalent: the Ghana point is calcined clay, not finished cement.Open figure in archive: Capture equipment is moving from pilots toward million-tonne projects; the 2029 points are scheduled capacities, not operating results.Open figure in archive: The earlier value is implied by IEA's reported 30% rise to 35 Mt. Both values are announced 2030 capacity, not production.Open figure in archive: Efficiency improves slowly and cannot eliminate limestone process emissions; the 2030 and 2050 values are IEA pathway milestones.Open figure in archive: The IEA near-zero limit becomes more stringent as clinker content falls, preventing dilution from masquerading as deep decarbonization.Open figure in archive: Announced 2030 near-zero cement capacity is only one tenth of the IEA-aligned requirement.Open figure in archive: Brevik's design captures only about half of the host plant's emissions.Open figure in archive: Early CCS cement plants are estimated to cost substantially more than conventional production.
Cradle-to-gate cement emissions intensityCradle-to-gate cement emissions intensity
Scale

GNR-based global average estimate · 762 kgCO2e/t cement · 1990 · verification unspecified

Cradle-to-gate cement emissions intensity over time, with measured values, projected values, and a goal at 125 kgCO2e/t cement.100200300400500600700800Cradle-to-gate cement emissions intensity · kgCO2e/t cementYear1990201120222030GOAL 125 · IEA near-zero ceiling for 100% cl…GNR-based global average es…GNR participating-producer…GNR-based global average es…Approximate GCCA target imp…~485 kgCO2e/t cement to goal
NOTE - The existing candidate metric is retained, but cement boundaries and product mixes vary. Historical values are industry GNR estimates, not a census. The IEA near-zero threshold slides from 125 kgCO2e/t at 100% clinker to 40 kgCO2e/t at lower clinker ratios, so 125 is an upper ceiling rather than one universal goal. The 2030 point is derived from GCCA's stated percentage target and is not achieved performance.
View data table
All metric observations
DateValueStatusCondition / labelVerificationCICensoringSource
1990762 kgCO2e/t cementobservedGNR-based global average estimateunspecified—noneTwo-hundred-year Portland cement review
2011629 kgCO2e/t cementobservedGNR participating-producer net intensityunspecified—noneMetric · GNR participating-producer net intensity
2022610 kgCO2e/t cementobservedGNR-based global average estimateunspecified—noneTwo-hundred-year Portland cement review
2030475 kgCO2e/t cementtargetApproximate GCCA target implied by a 20% cut from its roughly 594 kg/t 2020 levelunspecified—noneMetric · Approximate GCCA target implied by a 20% cut from its roughly 594 kg/t 2020 level
AS OF July 2026
View every data figure
Cradle-to-gate cement emissions intensityCradle-to-gate cement emissions intensity
Scale

GNR-based global average estimate · 762 kgCO2e/t cement · 1990 · verification unspecified

Cradle-to-gate cement emissions intensity over time, with measured values, projected values, and a goal at 125 kgCO2e/t cement.100200300400500600700800Cradle-to-gate cement emissions intensity · kgCO2e/t cementYear1990201120222030GOAL 125 · IEA near-zero ceiling for 100% cl…GNR-based global average es…GNR participating-producer…GNR-based global average es…Approximate GCCA target imp…~485 kgCO2e/t cement to goal
NOTE - The existing candidate metric is retained, but cement boundaries and product mixes vary. Historical values are industry GNR estimates, not a census. The IEA near-zero threshold slides from 125 kgCO2e/t at 100% clinker to 40 kgCO2e/t at lower clinker ratios, so 125 is an upper ceiling rather than one universal goal. The 2030 point is derived from GCCA's stated percentage target and is not achieved performance.
View data table
All metric observations
DateValueStatusCondition / labelVerificationCICensoringSource
1990762 kgCO2e/t cementobservedGNR-based global average estimateunspecified—noneTwo-hundred-year Portland cement review
2011629 kgCO2e/t cementobservedGNR participating-producer net intensityunspecified—noneMetric · GNR participating-producer net intensity
2022610 kgCO2e/t cementobservedGNR-based global average estimateunspecified—noneTwo-hundred-year Portland cement review
2030475 kgCO2e/t cementtargetApproximate GCCA target implied by a 20% cut from its roughly 594 kg/t 2020 levelunspecified—noneMetric · Approximate GCCA target implied by a 20% cut from its roughly 594 kg/t 2020 level
AS OF July 2026
Most historical progress came from efficiency and clinker substitution; the curve remains far above the IEA near-zero band.Most historical progress came from efficiency and clinker substitution; the curve remains far above the IEA near-zero band.

Independent records

Net CO2 intensity of conventional cement linear scale · kgCO2/t cementitious material

linear scale · kgCO2/t cementitious material
1990756 kgCO2/t cementitious material

Conditionsite, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ

2011629 kgCO2/t cementitious material

Conditionsite, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ

2022610 kgCO2/t cementitious material

Conditionsite, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ

observed self-reported target / pathway right-censored lower bound
View data table
All plotted observations
SeriesDateValueStatusCondition / labelVerificationCICensoringSource
Net CO2 intensity of conventional cement1990756 kgCO2/t cementitious materialobservedNet CO2 intensity of conventional cement
site, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ
unspecified—noneMetric · GNR participating-producer net intensity
Net CO2 intensity of conventional cement2011629 kgCO2/t cementitious materialobservedNet CO2 intensity of conventional cement
site, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ
unspecified—noneMetric · GNR participating-producer net intensity
Net CO2 intensity of conventional cement2022610 kgCO2/t cementitious materialobservedNet CO2 intensity of conventional cement
site, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ
unspecified—noneTwo-hundred-year Portland cement review
AS OF July 2026
Scale ranges from novel-binder pilots to industrial SCM production. The products and emissions cuts are not equivalent: the Ghana point is calcined clay, not finished cement.Scale ranges from novel-binder pilots to industrial SCM production. The products and emissions cuts are not equivalent: the Ghana point is calcined clay, not finished cement.

Independent records

Landmark low-clinker and alternative-binder nameplate log scale · t product/year

log scale · t product/year
2022100 t product/year

Conditionsite, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ

2023500,000 t product/year

Conditionsite, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ

202415,000 t product/year

Conditionsite, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ

2025400,000 t product/year

Conditionsite, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ

observed self-reported target / pathway right-censored lower bound
View data table
All plotted observations
SeriesDateValueStatusCondition / labelVerificationCICensoringSource
Landmark low-clinker and alternative-binder nameplate2022100 t product/yearobservedLandmark low-clinker and alternative-binder nameplate
site, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ
unspecified—noneSeries · Landmark low-clinker and alternative-binder nameplate
Landmark low-clinker and alternative-binder nameplate2023500000 t product/yearobservedLandmark low-clinker and alternative-binder nameplate
site, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ
unspecified—noneHolcim calcined-clay deployment
Landmark low-clinker and alternative-binder nameplate202415000 t product/yearobservedLandmark low-clinker and alternative-binder nameplate
site, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ
unspecified—noneSeries · Landmark low-clinker and alternative-binder nameplate
Landmark low-clinker and alternative-binder nameplate2025400000 t product/yearobservedLandmark low-clinker and alternative-binder nameplate
site, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ
unspecified—noneTimeline · Ghana scales calcined clay
AS OF July 2026
Capture equipment is moving from pilots toward million-tonne projects; the 2029 points are scheduled capacities, not operating results.Capture equipment is moving from pilots toward million-tonne projects; the 2029 points are scheduled capacities, not operating results.

Independent records

Cement-sector CO2 capture project nameplate log scale · tCO2/year

log scale · tCO2/year
201925,000 tCO2/year

Conditionsite, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ

2025400,000 tCO2/year

Conditionsite, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ

2029700,000 tCO2/year · projected

ConditionHeidelberg Materials planned 2029 capture nameplate

2029.11.200e+6 tCO2/year · projected

Conditionthyssenkrupp planned 2029 capture nameplate

observed self-reported target / pathway right-censored lower bound
View data table
All plotted observations
SeriesDateValueStatusCondition / labelVerificationCICensoringSource
Cement-sector CO2 capture project nameplate201925000 tCO2/yearobservedCement-sector CO2 capture project nameplate
site, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ
unspecified—noneSeries · Cement-sector CO2 capture project nameplate
Cement-sector CO2 capture project nameplate2025400000 tCO2/yearobservedCement-sector CO2 capture project nameplate
site, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ
unspecified—noneBrevik CCS opening
Cement-sector CO2 capture project nameplate2029700000 tCO2/yearprojectedCement-sector CO2 capture project nameplate
Heidelberg Materials planned 2029 capture nameplate
unspecified—noneTimeline · GeZero targets full capture
Cement-sector CO2 capture project nameplate2029.11200000 tCO2/yearprojectedCement-sector CO2 capture project nameplate
thyssenkrupp planned 2029 capture nameplate
unspecified—noneSeries · Cement-sector CO2 capture project nameplate
AS OF July 2026
The earlier value is implied by IEA's reported 30% rise to 35 Mt. Both values are announced 2030 capacity, not production.The earlier value is implied by IEA's reported 30% rise to 35 Mt. Both values are announced 2030 capacity, not production.

Independent records

Announced near-zero cement capacity for 2030 linear scale · Mt cement/year

linear scale · Mt cement/year
202427 Mt cement/year · target

Conditionsite, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ

202535 Mt cement/year · target

Conditionsite, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ

observed self-reported target / pathway right-censored lower bound
View data table
All plotted observations
SeriesDateValueStatusCondition / labelVerificationCICensoringSource
Announced near-zero cement capacity for 2030202427 Mt cement/yeartargetAnnounced near-zero cement capacity for 2030
site, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ
unspecified—noneIEA Breakthrough Agenda 2025: cement and concrete
Announced near-zero cement capacity for 2030202535 Mt cement/yeartargetAnnounced near-zero cement capacity for 2030
site, project or pathway record; nameplate and operating conditions differ
unspecified—noneIEA Breakthrough Agenda 2025: cement and concrete
AS OF July 2026
Efficiency improves slowly and cannot eliminate limestone process emissions; the 2030 and 2050 values are IEA pathway milestones.Efficiency improves slowly and cannot eliminate limestone process emissions; the 2030 and 2050 values are IEA pathway milestones.

Independent records

Kiln thermal energy intensity pathway linear scale · GJ/t clinker

linear scale · GJ/t clinker
20153.6 GJ/t clinker

ConditionIEA historical kiln-energy baseline, 2015

20223.4 GJ/t clinker

ConditionIEA historical kiln-energy baseline, 2022

20303.3 GJ/t clinker · pathway

ConditionIEA 2030 pathway milestone

20502.9 GJ/t clinker · pathway

ConditionIEA 2050 pathway milestone

observed self-reported target / pathway right-censored lower bound
View data table
All plotted observations
SeriesDateValueStatusCondition / labelVerificationCICensoringSource
Kiln thermal energy intensity pathway20153.6 GJ/t clinkerobservedKiln thermal energy intensity pathway
IEA historical kiln-energy baseline, 2015
unspecified—noneIEA cement technology tracking
Kiln thermal energy intensity pathway20223.4 GJ/t clinkerobservedKiln thermal energy intensity pathway
IEA historical kiln-energy baseline, 2022
unspecified—noneIEA cement technology tracking
Kiln thermal energy intensity pathway20303.3 GJ/t clinkerpathwayKiln thermal energy intensity pathway
IEA 2030 pathway milestone
unspecified—noneIEA cement technology tracking
Kiln thermal energy intensity pathway20502.9 GJ/t clinkerpathwayKiln thermal energy intensity pathway
IEA 2050 pathway milestone
unspecified—noneIEA cement technology tracking
AS OF July 2026
The IEA near-zero limit becomes more stringent as clinker content falls, preventing dilution from masquerading as deep decarbonization.The IEA near-zero limit becomes more stringent as clinker content falls, preventing dilution from masquerading as deep decarbonization.
100%-clinker threshold125 kgCO2e/t
−85 kgCO2e/t · 0.32× of A
Low-clinker threshold40 kgCO2e/t

Each square = 5 kgCO2e/t

100%-clinker threshold125 kgCO2e/t
Low-clinker threshold40 kgCO2e/t
85 kgCO2e/t less from low-clinker threshold than from 100%-clinker threshold
View data table
All aligned comparisons
ClaimABSource / provenance
The IEA near-zero limit becomes more stringent as clinker content falls, preventing dilution from masquerading as deep decarbonization.125 kgCO2e/t · 100%-clinker threshold40 kgCO2e/t · Low-clinker thresholdIEA near-zero cement definitions
AS OF July 2026
Announced 2030 near-zero cement capacity is only one tenth of the IEA-aligned requirement.Announced 2030 near-zero cement capacity is only one tenth of the IEA-aligned requirement.
Announced capacity35 Mt/year · announcedThis is announced 2030 capacity, not delivered output.Announced 2030 capacity is a declared project pipeline, not delivered output.
+315 Mt/year · gain 10
Implied required capacity350 Mt/year · targetThis is the scale needed in the scenario, not an achieved level.Implied required capacity is the scale target for the stated scenario, not an achieved level.

Each square = 10 Mt/year

Announced capacity35 Mt/year · announcedThis is announced 2030 capacity, not delivered output.Announced 2030 capacity is a declared project pipeline, not delivered output.
Implied required capacity350 Mt/year · targetThis is the scale needed in the scenario, not an achieved level.Implied required capacity is the scale target for the stated scenario, not an achieved level.
315 Mt/year more from implied required capacity than from announced capacity
View data table
All aligned comparisons
ClaimABSource / provenance
Announced 2030 near-zero cement capacity is only one tenth of the IEA-aligned requirement.35 Mt/year · Announced capacity · announced
This is announced 2030 capacity, not delivered output.Announced 2030 capacity is a declared project pipeline, not delivered output.
350 Mt/year · Implied required capacity · target
This is the scale needed in the scenario, not an achieved level.Implied required capacity is the scale target for the stated scenario, not an achieved level.
Timeline · Announced capacity reaches 35 Mt
AS OF July 2026
Brevik's design captures only about half of the host plant's emissions.Brevik's design captures only about half of the host plant's emissions.
Capture nameplate400,000 tCO2/year
+400,000 tCO2/year · gain 2
Approximate plant emissions800,000 tCO2/year

Each square = 20,000 tCO2/year

Capture nameplate400,000 tCO2/year
Approximate plant emissions800,000 tCO2/year
400,000 tCO2/year more from approximate plant emissions than from capture nameplate
View data table
All aligned comparisons
ClaimABSource / provenance
Brevik's design captures only about half of the host plant's emissions.400000 tCO2/year · Capture nameplate800000 tCO2/year · Approximate plant emissionsBrevik CCS opening
AS OF July 2026
Early CCS cement plants are estimated to cost substantially more than conventional production.Early CCS cement plants are estimated to cost substantially more than conventional production.
Low-end cost premium75 %
+75 % · gain 2
High-end cost premium150 %

Each square = 5 %

Low-end cost premium75 %
High-end cost premium150 %
75 % more from high-end cost premium than from low-end cost premium
View data table
All aligned comparisons
ClaimABSource / provenance
Early CCS cement plants are estimated to cost substantially more than conventional production.75 % · Low-end cost premium150 % · High-end cost premiumIEA Breakthrough Agenda 2025: cement and concrete
AS OF July 2026

Methods & conditions

Under the measurement.

The boundary of a measurement changes what it means.

Technical note 1 of 8

What near-zero excludes

Method and conditions

“Near-zero” is not synonymous with “low-carbon.” The IEA ceiling slides from 125 kgCO₂e/t at 100% clinker to 40 kgCO₂e/t at low clinker ratios, and its principles require a physical pathway without offsets or emissions-reduction credits.

Source notes

Technical notes and sources

Each note keeps its authored method, conditions and citations available for review.

What near-zero excludes

“Near-zero” is not synonymous with “low-carbon.” The IEA ceiling slides from 125 kgCO₂e/t at 100% clinker to 40 kgCO₂e/t at low clinker ratios, and its principles require a physical pathway without offsets or emissions-reduction credits.

H-UKR remains above near-zero

Hoffmann’s H-UKR is clinker-free but its 2025 cradle-to-gate EPD reported 141 kgCO₂e/t, down from 188 kgCO₂e/t in its earlier EPD. It is therefore a major reduction, but not within the IEA’s roughly 40 kgCO₂e/t low-clinker near-zero limit.

The accounting behind evoZero

Heidelberg’s accounting distinguishes physically identical cement volumes: conventional Brevik cement is listed at 451 kgCO₂e/t, proportionally allocated evoBuild at 230, and freely allocated single-site mass-balance evoZero at 46. Products are not physically segregated; a separate non-physical variant transfers Brevik attributes to locally produced cement and claims zero through certificates.

What the first certificates covered

DNV’s first disclosed assurance period covered 12,088.322 t of clinker produced under capture conditions and 2,389.099 tCO₂ confirmed injected. Each certificate carried 307.3 kgCO₂ reduction per tonne of clinker, net of capture, transport, storage and infrastructure impacts.

Oxyfuel is not storage

Pure Oxyfuel burns fuel in oxygen rather than air, avoiding nitrogen dilution and producing a concentrated CO₂ stream. The catch4climate kiln demonstrates that process integration; it does not itself prove permanent storage.

Electrification leaves process emissions

Fully electric clinker heating removes combustion emissions but does not remove limestone’s calcination CO₂. SaltX’s design aims to concentrate that stream for capture; “fully electrified” therefore does not mean “zero-emission cement.”

Electric cement’s scaling constraints

Cambridge Electric Cement substitutes already-decarbonated recovered paste for lime flux in steel recycling. EAF temperatures drive off problematic sulfate and chloride species and favour reactive alite, but scale depends on clean paste separation, scrap chemistry and EAF capacity.

Silicate cement’s theoretical floor

For silicate-derived Portland cement, a 2026 analysis estimated theoretical-minimum emissions of 49 kgCO₂/t, versus 609 kgCO₂/t from limestone. Its illustrative proven-unit-process route, however, requires 6.2 GJ/t, versus about 2.9 GJ/t for current limestone cement; the low-energy result remains theoretical, not achieved industrial performance.

05 · What it unlocksWhat it unlocks

If the remaining tests pass.If the remaining tests pass.

Downstream capabilities remain conditional on results that are not yet in.These are possible next capabilities, conditional on results that are not yet in.

TODAY
  1. PASSED · February 202301 ↗
    Use much less clinkerIndustrial Low-Clinker CementHolcim's French line is rated for 500,000 tonnes yearly and claims 50% lower CO2 than CEM I.Operate a plant producing at least 100,000 tonnes per year of standards-compliant cement with at least 40% lower cradle-to-gate emissions.
  2. PASSED · August 202503 ↗
    Store kiln carbon permanentlyFull-Chain Cement CCSBrevik completed the chain in 2025, but its design addresses about half the plant's emissions.Capture cement-kiln CO2, transport it and inject it into monitored permanent geological storage.
  3. OPEN TEST02 ↗
    Replace the kiln chemistryDrop-In Alternative BinderBrimstone passed ASTM C150 in the lab; Sublime's planned 30,000-tonne plant was paused.Make non-limestone or electrochemical cement that passes mainstream Portland-cement standards and scales beyond a pilot.
  4. OPEN TEST04 ↗
    Scale beyond one plantNear-Zero Commercial FleetOnly about 35 Mt/year is announced for 2030, and announced capacity is not production.Operate enough certified near-zero cement plants to supply the roughly 350 Mt/year needed in 2030.
PASSED · February 202301 ↗
Use much less clinkerIndustrial Low-Clinker CementHolcim's French line is rated for 500,000 tonnes yearly and claims 50% lower CO2 than CEM I.Operate a plant producing at least 100,000 tonnes per year of standards-compliant cement with at least 40% lower cradle-to-gate emissions.
PASSED · August 202503 ↗
Store kiln carbon permanentlyFull-Chain Cement CCSBrevik completed the chain in 2025, but its design addresses about half the plant's emissions.Capture cement-kiln CO2, transport it and inject it into monitored permanent geological storage.
TODAY
OPEN TEST02 ↗
Replace the kiln chemistryDrop-In Alternative BinderBrimstone passed ASTM C150 in the lab; Sublime's planned 30,000-tonne plant was paused.Make non-limestone or electrochemical cement that passes mainstream Portland-cement standards and scales beyond a pilot.
OPEN TEST04 ↗
Scale beyond one plantNear-Zero Commercial FleetOnly about 35 Mt/year is announced for 2030, and announced capacity is not production.Operate enough certified near-zero cement plants to supply the roughly 350 Mt/year needed in 2030.

Possible, if the open tests pass.

  1. Lower-carbon urbanization

    This is a possible benefit only if lower-carbon urbanization works safely, reliably and at useful scale.Potential benefit only if the stated use (Lower-carbon urbanization) is demonstrated with evidence for safety, reliability, affordability and scale.

  2. Durable carbon-storing infrastructure

    This is a possible benefit only if durable carbon-storing infrastructure works safely, reliably and at useful scale.Potential benefit only if the stated use (Durable carbon-storing infrastructure) is demonstrated with evidence for safety, reliability, affordability and scale.

  3. Cleaner megaproject construction

    This is a possible benefit only if cleaner megaproject construction works safely, reliably and at useful scale.Potential benefit only if the stated use (Cleaner megaproject construction) is demonstrated with evidence for safety, reliability, affordability and scale.

These are possible outcomes, if the open tests pass. They are conditional, not promises.
06 · The players & the moneyThe players & the money

Meet the builders.Meet the builders.

The organisations, their approaches, and the evidence behind them.The teams doing the work, the money around them, and what the record can support.

Germany / Norway · company

Heidelberg Materials

Operates Brevik CCS, the first industrial-scale carbon-capture facility attached to a cement plant.

Funding contextFunding not recorded in this record.Designed to capture roughly 400,000 tCO2/year, about half of the plant's emissions.
Named investorsInvestors not recorded in this record.

Capital is context, not a demonstration.

Company source ↗
View every builder record

Heidelberg Materials

Germany / Norway · company · Operates Brevik CCS, the first industrial-scale carbon-capture facility attached to a cement plant.

Funding: Funding not recorded in this record.

Designed to capture roughly 400,000 tCO2/year, about half of the plant's emissions.

Company source ↗

Sublime Systems

USA · company · Developing ambient-temperature electrochemical cement from non-carbonate rocks and industrial wastes.

Funding: Strategic investments · $75M combined · Sep 2024

Named investors: CRH · Holcim

The Holyoke commercial-factory schedule remained unachieved and later faced a federal-funding pause.

Company source ↗

Brimstone

USA · company · Developing a calcium-silicate rock refinery that co-produces Portland cement and other industrial materials.

Funding: Funding not recorded in this record.

DOE selected a proposed demonstration for up to $189M cost share; selection is not an operating plant or cumulative company funding.

Company source ↗

LC3 Project

International / Switzerland · nonprofit · Develops and transfers limestone-calcined-clay cement systems that reduce clinker using widely available clays.

Funding: Funding not recorded in this record.

Company source ↗

Ecocem

Ireland / EU · company · Developing ACT, a low-clinker cement formulation intended to work within existing standards and plants.

Funding: Funding not recorded in this record.

Its 70% reduction and 2035 scale language are company projections, not sector-wide achieved results.

Company source ↗
07 · SourcesSources

Follow the evidence.Follow the evidence.

50 sources — every figure on this page traces to one.50 sources — every figure on this page traces to one.

Source · what this page citesScope and limits
  1. 01

    IEA Breakthrough Agenda 2025: cement and concrete

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  2. 02

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  3. 03

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  4. 04

    GCCA Getting the Numbers Right database

    Read source ↗gccassociation.org

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  5. 05

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  6. 06

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  7. 07

    GCCA 2050 Net Zero Roadmap

    Read source ↗gccassociation.org

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  8. 08

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  9. 09

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  10. 10

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  11. 11

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  12. 12

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  13. 13

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  14. 14

    Timeline · Ransome patents rotary kiln

    Read source ↗patents.google.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  15. 15

    Timeline · Brevik tests amine capture

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  16. 16

    Timeline · Clinker-free plant is commissioned

    Read source ↗live.euronext.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  17. 17

    Timeline · Alternative route meets C150

    Read source ↗businesswire.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  18. 18

    Timeline · Cement-free concrete enters a building

    Read source ↗news.mit.edu

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  19. 19

    Timeline · Electric arc furnace reclinkers cement

    Read source ↗nature.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  20. 20

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  21. 21

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  22. 22

    Timeline · Captured-carbon cement reaches customers

    Read source ↗heidelbergmaterials.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  23. 23

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  24. 24

    Timeline · Electric process makes Portland clinker

    Read source ↗saltxtechnology.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  25. 25

    Timeline · Pure Oxyfuel research kiln starts

    Read source ↗heidelbergmaterials.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  26. 26

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  27. 27

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  28. 28

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  29. 29

    Metric · Approximate GCCA target implied by a 20% cut from its roughly 594 kg/t 2020 level

    Read source ↗gccassociation.org

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  30. 30

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  31. 31

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  32. 32

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  33. 33

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  34. 34

    Engineer note · H-UKR remains above near-zero

    Read source ↗ciments-hoffmann.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  35. 35

    Engineer note · The accounting behind evoZero

    Read source ↗evozero.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  36. 36

    Engineer note · What the first certificates covered

    Read source ↗evozero.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  37. 37

    Engineer note · Electrification leaves process emissions

    Read source ↗saltxtechnology.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  38. 38

    Engineer note · Silicate cement’s theoretical floor

    Read source ↗nature.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  39. 39

    companies · Sublime Systems

    Read source ↗sublime-systems.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  40. 40

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  41. 41

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  42. 42

    companies · Ecocem

    Read source ↗ecocemglobal.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  43. 43

    people · Leah Ellis

    Read source ↗sublime-systems.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  44. 44

    people · Cody Finke

    Read source ↗brimstone.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  45. 45

    geography · Norway

    Read source ↗brevikccs.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  46. 46

    Heidelberg Materials official site

    Read source ↗heidelbergmaterials.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  47. 47

    Sublime Systems official site

    Read source ↗sublime-systems.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  48. 48

    Brimstone official site

    Read source ↗brimstone.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  49. 49

    LC3 Project official site

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

  50. 50

    Ecocem official site

    Read source ↗ecocemglobal.com

    Scope: Not recorded. Limit: Not recorded.

Sources describe evidence. Inclusion is not endorsement.